Creators use GenAI for ideas and workflow—but authenticity still needs a boundary
Deloitte’s creator-economy research shows that creators see generative AI as a creative-assistance and workflow tool; it also highlights how automated interaction and persona use can affect audience perceptions of authenticity.
Creative assistance is an accessible starting point
In the public research, creators most expect to use generative AI for new content ideas. In practice, a tool can help expand topics, organise audience feedback and draft a first script, but it cannot replace a creator’s own editorial judgment.
“The value of a tool is not to replace creative judgment, but to turn repetitive work into a content process that can be reviewed.
Workflow support protects time for the work only people can do
For solo creators and small teams, scheduling, captions, version adaptation and research organisation can be systematised. The time saved is most useful when invested in characters, stories, live judgment and relationships with the audience.
The more automation you use, the clearer the authenticity boundary must be
The research also notes that automated interaction and virtual personas can change how audiences perceive authenticity. Set clear content boundaries, keep people involved in meaningful interactions and disclose the use of AI in commercial work where relevant.
Share your work for review and discuss an operating rhythm that balances efficiency, expression and trust.
Share your work for review